Korean Journal of Clinical Geriatrics

Indexed in /covered by CAS, KoreaScience & DOI/Crossref:eISSN 2383-5699   pISSN 1229-6538

Table. 4.

Table. 4.

Comparison the outcome of pre and postoperative voiding parameter between TUEB and HoLEP stratified by prostate weight

TUEB* (n=53) HoLEP (n=79)
N IPSS Qmax§ PVR Hb. N IPSS Qmax PVR Hb.
Subgroup 1 <50 g Pre 22 24.3±8.0 9.2±5.3 108.0±78.2 13.7±1.2 28 25.3±6.4 8.3±3.6 87.7±63.3 13.8±1.0
Post 10.9±4.7 17.7±6.9 90.7±85.5 13.1±1.4 12.4±5.2 18.1±7.7 54.1±48.0 13.3±1.3
P-value <.001 .001 .131 .015 <.001 <.001 .006 .008
Subgroup 2 50-80 g Pre 20 26.4±7.2 6.8±3.8 94.2±62.7 14.0±1.6 28 24.5±7.4 6.9±4.1 135.1±138.0 13.8±1.2
Post 11.4±4.3 13.2±3.8 86.2±77.5 13.1±1.6 11.8±4.7 14.2±9.6 73.7±65.3 13.2±1.1
P-value <.001 <.001 .445 .001 <.001 <.001 .002 .004
Subgroup 3 >80 g Pre 11 28.0±5.4 8.0±3.8 168.5±192.7 12.9±2.0 23 27.5±6.1 8.5±3.4 127.3±48.0 13.5±1.6
Post 13.0±4.5 11.1±6.3 71.9±44.7 11.6±1.6 12.0±6.1 15.6±9.1 88.9±72.7 12.4±1.7
P-value .003 .100 .016 .003 <.001 <.001 .002 <.001

*Transurethral enucleation with bipolar; Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; International prostate symptom score; §Peak flow rate; Post-voided residual urine; Hemoglobin.

Korean J Clin Geri 2022;23:123-130 https://doi.org/10.15656/kjcg.2022.23.2.123
© 2022 Korean J Clin Geri