Korean Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology

Table. 2.

Table. 2.

Comparison of the outcome between TUEB and HoLEP stratified by prostate weight

Surgery Age Prostate weight estimated by TRUS* (g) Resected weight (g) Resection time (min) Resection efficiency (g/m) Catheter indwelling time (day) PSA (ng/mL) Pre-Operation Post-Operation
Qmax (mL/s) PVR§ (mL) IPSS Hb. Qmax (mL/s) PVR (mL) IPSS Hb.
Subgroup 1 <50 g TUEB** (N=22) 69.2±8.0 37.1±8.5 28.3±8.1 33.8±11.8 0.86±0.12 4.1±1.4 5.8±17.3 9.2±5.3 108.0±78.2 24.3±8.0 13.7±1.2 17.7±6.9 90.7±85.5 10.9±4.7 13.1±1.4
HoLEP†† (N=28) 69.6±7.2 39.7±6.5 26.6±5.2 39.7±7.1 0.67±0.08 3.7±1.1 2.6±2.5 8.3±3.6 87.7±63.3 25.3±6.4 13.8±1.0 18.1±7.7 54.1±48.0 12.4±5.2 13.3±1.3
P-value .860 .343 .681 .100 <.001 .340 .204 .564 .300 .710 .837 .938 .214 .312 .822
Subgroup 2 50-80 g TUEB (N=20) 71.3±6.4 61.5±8.8 48.5±8.5 61.5±11.9 0.79±0.10 4.0±1.1 6.7±6.5 6.8±3.8 94.2±62.7 26.4±7.2 14.0±1.6 13.2±3.8 86.2±77.5 11.4±4.3 13.1±1.6
HoLEP (N=28) 72.9±7.6 61.0±7.5 44.3±11.6 55.2±14.3 0.80±0.04 4.3±1.7 6.3±7.9 6.9±4.1 135.1±138.0 24.5±7.4 13.8±1.2 14.2±9.6 73.7±65.3 11.8±4.7 13.2±1.1
P-value .698 .917 .119 .119 .139 .796 .490 .879 .517 .362 .676 .842 .503 .850 .933
Subgroup 3 >80 g TUEB (N=11) 74.0±7.1 95.9±15.8 81.2±14.8 107.6±20.2 0.75±0.06 4.4±1.4 8.6±6.0 8.0±3.8 168.5±192.7 28.0±5.4 12.9±2.0 11.1±6.3 71.9±44.7 13.0±4.5 11.6±1.6
HoLEP (N=23) 71.8±7.2 101.5±19.0 84.3±15.3 93.2±20.7 0.91±0.10 4.8±2.0 20.4±26.7 8.5±3.4 127.3±48.0 27.5±6.1 13.5±1.6 15.6±9.1 88.9±72.7 12.0±6.1 12.4±1.7
P-value .356 .387 .593 .026 <.001 .770 .204 .581 .543 .985 .495 .232 .685 .426 .217

*Transrectal ultrasonography; Prostate specific antigen; Peak flow rate; §Post-voided residual urine; International prostate symptom score; Hemoglobin; **Transurethral enucleation with bipolar; ††Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Korean J Clin Geri 2022;23:123-130 https://doi.org/10.15656/kjcg.2022.23.2.123
© 2022 Korean J Clin Geri